Thought of as opposed to stated societal referent acceptance and you may partnership union and you will perseverance

Partner needs within the internet dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from popular with terrible: Disenchantment which have a romantic partner. Sociological Viewpoints, 49, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]

Fiore, An excellent. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily inside internet dating: Whenever would you such some body including yourself? CHI, appointment into peoples issues for the measuring options. 1317-1374. [ Backlinks ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you can incompatibility inside the kids’ fellow and you can sis relationship. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, An effective. (2004). Wild birds out of a beneficial feather otherwise unusual wild birds? Connections certainly one of identity proportions, resemblance, and you will ily Mindset, cuatro, 564-574. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Couple similarity and marital fulfillment: Are comparable spouses happy. Diary of Identity, 74, 1401-1420. [ Website links ]

Goffman, Elizabeth. (1952). For the cooling the mark away: Certain facet of version to help you failure. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Website links ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, overlap, and you can dating satisfaction inside the relationships and you can married people. Diary from Identity and you may Societal Therapy, 93, 34-48. [ Backlinks ]

Private Dating, 15, 281-295

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Echo, mirror: The significance of seems from inside the lifestyle. Albany: State University of the latest York Press. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Coordinating hypothesis. In the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia off human dating (Vol. 2, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Age., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Meters., & Hay, J. (1985). Collateral and you will close connections: Current lookup. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible relationship (pp. 91-117). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A great., & Ariely, D. (2010). Complimentary and you can sorting in internet dating. American Monetary Comment, 100, 130-163. [ Backlinks ]

Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Create on the web relationships assessment really works? An assessment regarding original proof getting a publicized ‘predictive make of erican Journal away from Mindset, 6, 507-526. [ Website links ]

Houts, Roentgen. M., Robins, Age., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility as well as the development of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Website links ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). Early relationship roots out of conjugal worry and you can split up. Current Recommendations into the Psychological Technology, ten, 116-119. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Inclusion. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible relationships (pp. 1-7). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. Roentgen. (2009)patibility. Into the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out of individual dating (Vol. step 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Website links ]

Kalick, S. Yards., & Hamilton III, T. Elizabeth. (1986). The latest complimentary theory reexamined. Log out-of Character and you may Societal Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Hyperlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The new longitudinal span of marital high quality and you can balances: A look at principle, procedures, and browse. Emotional Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Hyperlinks ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1997). Neuroticism, relationship communication, additionally the trajectory off relationship satisfaction. Record off Character and you may Social Therapy, 72, 1075-1092. [ Backlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual influences with the matrimony: Effects to own coverage and input. Current Rules into the Emotional Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Website links ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Elizabeth. Tyskland singlar, Christensen, A great., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, Grams. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Evaluating intimate relationship. In H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, An excellent. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger. D. Roentgen. Peterson (Eds.), Personal dating (pp. 20-67). New york: Freeman. [ Links ]